Sample AI Visibility Dashboard

AI Visibility Coverage

64%

Appears in 16 of 25 prompts

Recommendation Rate

48%

Listed as option in 12 of 25

Avg Position

2.3

When mentioned (1 = first)

First-Party Citations

38%

Own domain vs third-party

Platform Breakdown

Most recent capture

Platform	Coverage	Avg Position	Notes
Google AI Overviews	78%	1.8	Strongest presence
Claude	71%	2.1	Consistent placement
Gemini	64%	2.4	More distributed
ChatGPT	42%	3.2	Gap identified

Competitive Positioning

Share of Mentions

1

Competitor A 28%

2

Example Brand 24%

3

Competitor B 19%

4

Competitor C 17%

5

Other brands 12%

Top Co-Mention Pairs

Example Brand + Competitor A

73%

Appear together in 73% of shared responses

Competitor A + Competitor B

68%

Frequently paired in comparison queries

Example Brand + Competitor C

41%

Less frequent pairing

Competitive Coverage Gaps

Keywords where competitors appear but your brand doesn't

CA

competitor-a.com

Wins 4 keywords

best platforms for project management (1.2k) enterprise collaboration tools (900) compare productivity software (750)

Visible on: AIO ChatGPT Claude Gemini

Create detailed, well-cited content that LLMs prefer to reference

CB

competitor-b.com

Wins 3 keywords

affordable business software (850) small business solutions (720)

Visible on: AIO ChatGPT Claude

Build community presence - create helpful posts and engage in discussions

Platform Visibility Gaps

Keywords where you're missing from specific platforms

Keyword	AIO	GPT	Claude	Gemini	Gaps
best online platforms for marketing					4 gaps
enterprise collaboration software					4 gaps
alternatives to competitor a					2 gaps
compare project management tools					3 gaps
is competitor b worth it					4 gaps

Brands Cited by AI

28 total citations

Domains mentioned across AI platform responses

CA

competitor-a.com

ChatGPT (5), Claude (7)

12

CB

competitor-b.com

ChatGPT (6), Gemini (4)

10

MP

marketplace.com

Claude (3), Gemini (4)

7

RS

review-site.com

ChatGPT (4), Claude (2)

6

PS

publisher-site.com

Claude (3)

3

CC

competitor-c.com

Gemini (2)

2

Query Intent Mix

Visibility varies by query type — brand appears more in discovery contexts than decision queries

Discovery ("Best X for Y")

82%

Comparison ("X vs Y")

71%

Evaluation ("Which X is...")

64%

Decision ("Should I...")

48%

Natural Language ("I need help with...")

39%

Visibility concentrates in discovery and comparison queries. Lower presence in decision-stage and natural language contexts.

How AI Describes the Brand

Top Descriptors

"reliable" 34×

"trusted" 28×

"comprehensive" 22×

Descriptor Clusters

Trust signals

reliable, trusted, established

Breadth

comprehensive, wide selection

User experience

user-friendly, easy to use

Sample Excerpts

ChatGPT

"...a well-established option with a strong reputation..."

Claude

"...known for reliable service and comprehensive coverage..."

Evidence & Citations

Source types referenced when brand appears — evidence varies by model and query

Domain / Source	Citations	Type
examplebrand.com	34	First-party
publisher-site.com	28	Publisher
review-site.com	19	Review
industryblog.com	12	Publisher
marketplace.com	8	Other

First-party citations: 34% · Publisher: 40% · Review: 19% · Other: 7%

Exportable Outputs

PDF Report

Formatted summary

CSV Data

Prompt-level results

Slide Summary

Executive deck

See Your Brand's Dashboard

Request a diagnostic to get real visibility metrics, competitor analysis, and platform-specific insights for your brand

Request a Diagnostic See How Monitoring Works

About This Sample

This is an illustrative example using public prompts and placeholder data to demonstrate platform capabilities. Actual results vary by model, time, geography, and prompt phrasing. Brand names used are examples ("Example Brand", "Competitor A/B/C"). No endorsement or market ranking is implied. Client reports include custom prompt sets, real competitive data, and time-series tracking.